SMB-grade SD-WAN with active-active failover and plug-and-play deployment. The pitch isn't "enterprise SASE consolidation"; it's "we have one location, one internet circuit that fails twice a month, and we don't have an IT team that can configure BGP." For sub-250-employee organizations where commodity router failover isn't cutting it and Cato or Meraki MX is over-spec, this is the conversation.
Bigleaf's product is straightforward: a hardware appliance that you plug between your internet circuits and your local network. It actively uses both circuits simultaneously, monitors application performance across both, and shifts traffic to the better-performing path in sub-second windows. Failover from one circuit to another doesn't drop calls or sessions. Setup takes about 15 minutes — no BGP, no certificates, no consultants. For SMB orgs where the actual problem is "our internet quality is killing video calls" rather than "we need single-vendor SASE consolidation," this is the right shape.
Sub-250 employees. One IT person or outsourced IT. Internet quality is meaningfully impacting business operations. Bigleaf is the right shape at this scale.
Customer-facing operations dependent on internet uptime. Single-site or small multi-site. The economics scale to your business.
Bigleaf can scale here, but Cisco Meraki's centralized management is usually the better fit at multi-site scale. Worth comparing.
Wrong scope. Brief Cato Networks for consolidation; brief Fatpipe for federal/regulated multi-WAN aggregation.